This blog is now on bloglovin'. Use the button on the right to follow me on bloglovin'
<a href="http://www.bloglovin.com/blog/10317033/?claim=fnuzn5nkkgn">Follow my blog with Bloglovin</a>
The Bible, Science, and Today
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Thursday, May 16, 2013
A Little About Me and Why I Am Unable to Post
My name is Jessica and I am an undergraduate pursuing a degree in Forensic Science with a minor in Forensic Anthropology. I am currently home for the summer and do not have the academic books that I had available for me at my university. Therefore, I am going to postpone the blog posts until I am able to do adequate research. I will begin posting again at the beginning of September.
Jessica
Friday, May 3, 2013
Science, the Bible, and Its Critics
The scientific concepts that are present in the
Bible that were not conceived yet by scientists of the time is usually
interpreted by Christians to show that the authors of the Bible had divine
inspiration for their writings. This is
due to the fact that the authors of the Bible knew scientific related concepts
before other people of the time knew these concepts. Non-Christians usually do not follow this
interpretation and instead offer a common rebuttal: If the Bible was written by
divine inspiration and is the Word of God, then why are their scientific
inaccuracies and contradictions in other parts of the Bible? Some of the parts in the Bible that
non-Christians say are inaccuracies are when the Bible uses the term “ends of
the earth” and that the Bible talks about a world that does not move (according
to “Holes in the Holy Bible”). Some of
the common contradictions that non-Christians present are: Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 contradicting each
other about how many days it took God to create the earth and the universe, and
the contradictions in the genealogy of Jesus presented in Matthew and Luke(according
to “Some Reasons Why humanists Reject the Bible”).
Ends of the Earth
“Have you
commanded the morning since your days began,
And caused the dawn to know its place,
And caused the dawn to know its place,
That it
might take hold of the ends of the earth,
And the wicked be shaken out of it?” (Job 38: 12-13 NKJV)
And the wicked be shaken out of it?” (Job 38: 12-13 NKJV)
Have you ever tried to hold a ball in your
hands? Do you hold the sides or the
extremities of the ball? The word “Kanaph”
is the original Hebrew for the word that has been translated as “ends” (Brown,
Briggs, Driver, Gesenius, Robinson & Rödiger, 1906). This word can also be translated as
“extremity” (Brown, Briggs, Driver, Gesenius, Robinson & Rödiger, 1906). When the Bible says the ends of the earth, I
believe that it means the extremities, not the edges like a flat rectangle
would have. Many critics of the Bible
state that this points to the earth being flat instead of being a sphere, but this
does not line up with other scripture. In
Isaiah 40:22, it says, “It is He who sits above the circle of the earth…”
(NKJV). If the world was flat, God could
not sit above the circle of the earth (or the curve of the earth if the
original Hebrew is translated differently, as discussed in a past post). Therefore, I believe that it means the parts
of a sphere that God could hold and does not contradict science.
World does not move
“The Lord
reigns, He is clothed with majesty;
The Lord is
clothed, He has girded Himself with strength.
Surely the
world is established, so that it cannot be moved.” (Psalm 93:1 NKJV)
Many critics of the Bible believe this verse means
that the earth does not orbit the sun and does not move in space, but this is
not what I believe that this verse is saying.
In the original Hebrew, the word for move is “Mowt” (Brown, Briggs,
Driver, Gesenius, Robinson & Rödiger, 1906). This word can also be translated as shake (Brown,
Briggs, Driver, Gesenius, Robinson & Rödiger, 1906). I believe that this verse means that the earth
is established in the solar system and that the laws of the earth (such as
gravity, thermodynamics, and etc.) cannot be changed.
Genesis 1 and 2
in the day
that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” (Genesis 2:4 NKJV)
Many Bible critics believe that this verse
contradicts the creation story that is told in the first chapter of
Genesis. As I have said before, the word
that is typically translated as day (from Hebrew into English) is the word “Yowm”. Yomn is the word that is used in this verse
as day. Yomn can also be translated as
time. I believe that this verse talks
about the time period in which God made earth, the universe and everything in
it.
Genealogy of Jesus
Below is the differing genealogies that are
present in Matthew and in Luke:
As you can see, from David down to Jesus is very
inconsistent. Many critics of the Bible
use this to show that the Bible contradicts itself. I believe that there are several explanations
to the differing genealogies.
One possible explanation is due to the Levirate
marriage tradition. In this tradition,
if the husband dies and did not have any sons, the husband’s brother could
marry his brother’s widow to carry on the deceased husband’s name. This would mean that Joseph, Jesus’s earthly
father, may have had both a biological and legal father. This would mean that one genealogy could be
of Joseph’s biological father while the other genealogy could be of Joseph’s
legal father.
Another explanation is that the genealogy of Jesus
presented in Matthew follows the genealogy of Joseph and the genealogy of Jesus
presented in Luke is the genealogy of Mary.
This would mean that Heli could be Mary’s biological Father and Joseph’s
surrogate father. If Heli did not have
any sons, it would be normal custom to make Joseph his heir.
I believe that the Bible is the infallible Word of
God and that there are no contradictions to itself or to science. I believe that the Bible is the truth and
that it will stand through the test of time.
References:
Brown, F., Briggs, C. A., Driver, S. R., Gesenius, W.,
Robinson, E., & Rödiger, E. (1906). The brown-driver-briggs hebrew
and english lexicon with an appendix containing the biblical aramaic.
“Some Reasons Why
Humanists Reject the Bible”. Assoc., A.
H. (n.d.). Retrieved May 3, 2013 from
http://www.americanhumanist.org/humanism/Some_Reasons_Why_Humanists_Reject_the_Bible
“The Geneology of
Jesus”. Fairchild, M. (n.d.). Retrieved
May, 3, 2012 from http://christianity.about.com/od/biblefactsandlists/a/jesusgenealogy.htm
“The Holes in the Holy Bible”. n.d.. Retrieved May 3, 2013 from
http://biblebabble.curbjaw.com/bible.htm
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Updated Posts
I have now updated the previous posts on creationism based on more research. Enjoy the updated posts!
Monday, April 29, 2013
Scientific Knowledge in the Bible
The Bible mentions many scientific concepts, many of which
had not yet been theorized by scientists at the time that the scriptures were
written. In this blog, I will discuss a
few of the scientific concepts that I am referring to. In the next blog entry I will discuss the
implications of the Bible showing scientific knowledge before the ideas were
theorized by scientists and the common rebuttals to these implications.
The first of these scientific concepts are is that the earth
is not flat. In Isaiah 40:22, it says, “It
is He who sits above the circle of the earth…” (NKJV). Chung, the Hebrew word that is translated in
Isaiah 40:22 as circle, can be also be translated as circuit and compass (Brown,
Briggs, Driver, Gesenius, Robinson & Rödiger, 1906). According to dictionary.com, the
word compass, in English, means “forming a curve or an arc”. This indicates that the earth is not flat,
but is indeed round. The Book of Isaiah
was written by Isaiah, a prophet who was born somewhere between 770 B.C. and
760 B.C. (Gilbert, 2009, p.100). The
first person outside of the Bible known to have stated that the Earth is not
flat, but spherical is Pythagorean (Garwood, 2007, p. 19). Pythagorean was born in approximately 569
B.C. and died between 500 and 475 B.C. (Douglass, 2005). He was born almost 200 years after Isaiah was
born. Therefore, Isaiah knew that the earth
was not flat many years before the first Greek scientists knew that the earth
was a sphere. This knowledge was most
likely of divine origin.
Job 8 compares a plant’s dependence on environmental factors
to a man’s dependence on God. It states
that I plant cannot grow without sunlight.
This is a scientific concept way before the times of scientists. It is hypothesized that Job was written
between 1000 and 800 B.C. (Gilbert, 2009, p. 126). According to the Science
Encyclopedia, Jan Ingenhousz (who lived from 1730-1799 A.D.) was the first
to hypothesize that plant growth was dependent on light. This could be evidence of divine origin of
the Bible.
The Bible also correctly estimates the number of pi. This cannot be seen in the English versions
of the Bible, but rather it can be seen in the Hebrew version of the
Bible. In 1 King 7:23 (NKJV), the Bible
says, “And he made the Sea of cast bronze, ten cubits from one brim to the
other; it was completely round. Its height was five cubits, and a line of
thirty cubits measured its circumference”, but the numbers are not accurate to
the original text as there is a problem within the translation. In Hebrew, the alphabet has numerical
values. When translated properly into English
numbers, the value of pi is 15 times better than the estimated value of pi
commonly used in schools (22/7). For
more information about the value of pi in the Bible, please visit this website, where I got
my information on this topic.
As you can see, the Bible is accurate on many scientific
concepts known today. Next time I will
discuss the implications related to this knowledge.
References:
Brown, F., Briggs, C. A., Driver, S. R.,
Gesenius, W., Robinson, E., & Rödiger, E. (1906). The brown-driver-briggs hebrew and english lexicon with an
appendix containing the biblical aramaic.
Douglass, C. (2005). Retrieved from
http://www.mathopenref.com/pythagoras.html
Garwood, C. (2007). Flat earth: The history of an infamous idea. New York, New
York: St. Martin's Press.
Gilbert, C. (2009). A complete introduction to the bible. New York, New
York: Paulist Press.
Friday, April 26, 2013
Jesus and Archaeology
Although
there is no archaeological evidence directly pointing to the existence of
Jesus, there is an abundance of archaeological evidence that relates to the
time period that Jesus lived, to people that Jesus encountered while here on
earth and also to the early Christian church.
These include the Galilee boat and the ossuary of James (Jesus’s brother).
"Jesus boat" |
In 1986,
the waters of the Sea of Galilee were at low levels (Currie & Hyslop, 2010,
p. 274). This is when what has been
called the Galilee boat (and also known as the “Jesus boat”) was found. The boat measures 30 feet long and 8 feet
wide (Currie & Hyslop, 2010, p. 274).
It is dated back between the last of the 1st century B.C.E.
and the middle of 1st century C.E. (Currie & Hyslop, 2010, p.
274).
The ossuary
possibly belonging to James, Jesus’s half-brother has also been found (Vergano,
2010). The limestone box containing
human remains has an inscription on the outside that states, “James, son
of
Joseph, brother of Jesus” (Vergano, 2010).
Bone boxes of this sort were used between the years 20 B.C. and 70
A.D. James died in A.D. 62 (Vergano,
2010). The inscription seems to be
authentic, but it cannot be verified.
There are claims that the “brother of Jesus” part of the inscription
could have been forged, but nonetheless it could have belonged to James.
The Possible Ossuary of James, half-brother of Jesus |
Although
these two finds do not point to anything concrete, they are appealing. If the ossuary and its inscription are indeed
authentic, this could point to the existence of Jesus. Although the boat found in the Sea of Galilee
was named the “Jesus boat”, this shows that boats existed during that time
period that could carry thirteen people, Jesus and his 12 disciples, as occurred
several times in the Gospels (Currie & Hyslop, 2010, p. 274). This both are very interesting finds,
although the meaning of these finds are a matter of opinion.
Note: I will be changing the posting schedule to
only twice a week (Mondays and Fridays) in order to allow time for more
thorough research. Also, I will be
editing past posts in order to be more thorough on those posts. Thanks for your understanding.
References:
Currie, R., & Hyslop, S. G.
(2010). The letter and the scroll, what archaeology tells us about the
bible. Natl Geographic Society.
[Untitled photograph of the possible ossuary of
James]. (n.d.). Retrieved April 26, 2013, from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/story/2012-03-17/james-ossuary-jesus/53578490/1
[Untitled photograph of the Jesus Boat]. (n.d.). Retrieved April
26, 2013, from
Vergano, D. (2012, March 18). 'james
ossuary’ verdict adds to burial box furor. Retrieved from
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/story/2012-03-17/james-ossuary-jesus/53578490/1
Monday, April 22, 2013
Capital Punishment: A Biblical Prospective
The Bible mentions capital punishment for several different
crimes a few of which are homicide (Exod. 21:12, Lev. 24:17, and Num.
35:16-34), kidnapping (Exod. 21:16, Deut. 24:7), and human sacrifice (Lev.
20:2-5)1, but do these rules still apply to today’s times? Should the United States continue allowing
capital punishment in certain states?
It has been debated both among Christians and among
non-Christians upon whether capital punishment is good or bad. Upon reading the Bible, this could be interpreted
for both sides. There were a lot of
rules for capital punishment in the Old Testament and there are a lot of scripture
in the New Testament that could also be seen as promoting capital punishment. There is also scripture in the New Testament
that could be used to say that capital punishment is immoral. I am going to discuss several of these
scripture and tell what I believe each of these scriptures entail. Since this is a more opinionated discuss on
the interpretation of scripture, I will use a variety of sources.
Here
is a Christian who supports the death penalty.
These are a lot of the most popular reasons that Christians believe in
capital punishment.
The most popular reason for Christians to believe in the
death penalty is Exodus 20:13 which, in the KJV, says, “Thou shalt not kill.” Most biblical scholars believe that this
should instead be interpreted as “thou shall not murder” which is what most
modern Bibles state. Christians that
support the death penalty say that it is not murder, but rather is just
killing. According to www.thefreedictionary.com,
the definition of murder is “the unlawful killing of one human by another, especially
with premeditated malice”. Whether the
act is unlawful depends on whether the act is legal at the time, i.e. whether
the death penalty is legal in that state or not. The phrase “premeditated malice” leads to my
conclusion that the death penalty is murder and therefore is spoke against in
Exodus 20:13. The death penalty is
premeditated and I also believe that it shows malice because the death penalty
is intended for revenge. It is intended
to harm someone because of an act that they committed to someone else. Therefore, I believe that this scripture does
not promote the death penalty, but rather speaks against the death penalty.
Furthermore, Jesus’s nature is forgiving. Jesus not only supports, but demands
forgiveness. In Matthew 18:21-22 (KJV), the Bible says, “Then Peter came to
Him and said, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive
him? Up to seven times?” Jesus said to him, “I do
not say to you, up to seven times, but up to seventy times seven.” This states that we should forgive each other
when someone sins against us. In Mark
11:25, Jesus says, ““And whenever you stand praying, if you have anything
against anyone, forgive him, that your Father in heaven may also forgive you
your trespasses.” Jesus says that if we
do not forgive those that sin against us, God will not forgive us of our
sins. If we kill someone because they
have sinned by murdering someone else, how is this showing forgiveness towards
that person? This testimony
about why the song “Forgiveness”
by Matthew West was written shows how powerful forgiveness can be. (Here is the full story about this testimony.)
There are many other scriptures that may point to capital
punishment as being holy, but for the verses that I have shared above, I have
decided that the death penalty is immoral.
I think that forgiveness is better than revenge and this is something
that I live by. I believe that there are
better ways to protect our society than the death penalty.
Notes:
A
comprehensive list of mentions of capital punishment in the Bible can be seen
in “Capital Punishment and the Bible” by G.C. Hanks (2002).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)