How does the topic of the origin of life and the universe
apply to today?
Why does it matter what happened that long ago?
The controversy of the origin of life and the origin of the
universe are topics that have been debated frequently in recent years. Recently, these topics have become popular
because of the debate of whether or not creation science should be taught in public
schools. The Supreme Court case Edwards
v. Aguillard (1987) declared that requiring creation science to be taught
alongside evolution was unconstitutional because it promoted a particular
religion1.
Through my research of the two models of the origin of life
and the universe, I have realized two flaws in the public school systems. Firstly, the traditional wording of evolution
as a theory is quite misleading. A
theory, using scientific terms, is a hypothesis or group of hypothesizes that
have been tested repeatedly and have not
been disproved2. Therefore,
both evolution and intelligent design (also known as creation science) are not
theories, but rather models that attempt to explain the origins of life and of
the universe2.
The second flaw in public school systems is the assumption
that the evolution model is scientific, whereas the creation model is merely
religious2. Neither models
can be tested as the events that occurred happened at one event in time and
this event cannot be repeated.
Therefore, science can only propose models that may fit the event that
occurred, but conclusions of what had to of occurred cannot be proven by science.
In order to compare the two models and determine which one
is more probable, only the scientific aspects of each model should be considered. In this discussion of the two models, all
scriptural references will not be included in order to keep this a purely
scientific discussion.
References
1.
Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987)
2.
Morris,
H. M. (1974). Scientific creationism. Master Books.
No comments:
Post a Comment